<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ai-Research on The Augmented Scholar</title><link>https://augmentedscholars.com/tags/ai-research/</link><description>Recent content in Ai-Research on The Augmented Scholar</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:59:48 +0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://augmentedscholars.com/tags/ai-research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Elicit — AI Research Assistant</title><link>https://augmentedscholars.com/tools/elicit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://augmentedscholars.com/tools/elicit/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="what-elicit-actually-does"&gt;What Elicit Actually Does&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elicit is the AI tool I recommend for literature review — not ChatGPT, not Perplexity. The reason: Elicit is purpose-built for academic papers and actually retrieves real papers from Semantic Scholar, not hallucinated citations.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Researcher's Guide to Using AI Without Losing Scientific Integrity</title><link>https://augmentedscholars.com/posts/ai-research/guide-ai-research-integrity/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://augmentedscholars.com/posts/ai-research/guide-ai-research-integrity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;AI tools are the most significant productivity shift in academic research since Google Scholar. They are also, if used without a framework, a reliable way to publish a retraction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide gives you the framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>