<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Chatgpt on The Augmented Scholar</title><link>https://augmentedscholars.com/tags/chatgpt/</link><description>Recent content in Chatgpt on The Augmented Scholar</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:59:48 +0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://augmentedscholars.com/tags/chatgpt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ChatGPT — AI Research Assistant</title><link>https://augmentedscholars.com/tools/chatgpt/</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://augmentedscholars.com/tools/chatgpt/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="chatgpt-for-researchers--what-its-actually-good-for"&gt;ChatGPT for Researchers — What It&amp;rsquo;s Actually Good For&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ChatGPT is the entry point for most researchers into AI-assisted work. The key is knowing which tasks it handles well and where it fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>How AI Actually Works: A Plain-Language Guide for Researchers Who Don't Code</title><link>https://augmentedscholars.com/posts/ai-literacy/how-ai-works-plain-language/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://augmentedscholars.com/posts/ai-literacy/how-ai-works-plain-language/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;AI will replace researchers&amp;rdquo; says one headline. &amp;ldquo;AI is useless and makes things up&amp;rdquo; says another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both are wrong, and the reason most people hold one of these extreme views is that they don&amp;rsquo;t have a working mental model of what AI tools actually are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>